Generative AI Underlines Continuing Value of Healthcare Data Archiving Solutions

Sep 25, 2024 | Article

Written By: Jim Jacobs, President and CEO, MediQuant

An AI platform that turns clinicians notes into structured data within seconds. A virtual assistant that gathers 20,000 nurse handoffs per shift.

AI in healthcare is no longer just hype — it’s actively being implemented to enhance clinical care and operational efficiency. Generative AI offers health systems and hospitals the ability to derive more value from patient claims, monitor payers more closely, equip physicians with useful information at the point of care, and much more.

Driving these advancements, however, requires relevant data — even hospital archive data from 10 or more years ago — that has been normalized and made available to current software. Preserving data in a central repository ensures it’s continually accessible and usable by hospitals to bolster finances, improve workflows, and take better care of patients.

1. Keeping Payer Scorecards for Oversight

Every contract is a promise between the vendor and the client. At its core, a vendor promises a certain service standard in exchange for a prompt payment over the contract period. Payer contracts can be wide-ranging in terms of scope and payments for various visit types, procedures, disease states, patient acuity, and more. Before contract renewal time, payers have crunched data from the claims to determine what they want to pay for the next contract period for various visits and procedures. But how is the payer doing in terms of the current contract? Hospitals are using current and archived data coupled with AI technologies to answer these questions, creating payer scorecards. Exploring claims performance against contract schedules can uncover instances where the payer has fallen short, either in terms of responsiveness to deadlines or paying less than the contracted rate for certain procedures and visit types. These scorecards are useful at contract negotiation time to hold payers to account for current actions.

2. Recovering Revenue Via Denial Management

Hospitals should be using current claims data to explore why claims get denied to determine both what went wrong and how to do better in the future. However, payers aren’t infallible. While many hospitals examine current claims to uncover denial management trends, it also makes sense to explore historic claims. Consider this example. A health system pulls together current data and the last 10 years of historic data from the archive to explore denial management opportunities. Rather than preserve hospital archive data for potential outside audits that could cost the health system money, it is actively seeking additional revenue by investigating past claims practices.

3. Helping Physicians at the Point of Care

Physicians want to make every second count at the point of care, although authorization burdens and increasing workloads often cut into that valuable time. EHRs are great for accessing current patient information, but system upgrades or migrations only bring over a bare minimum of data, leaving years of patient information in legacy systems or in an archive. The process of EHR data archiving involves validating and normalizing data before placing it in an active archive, where physicians can easily search for current and historical data. While AI can enhance some processes, we focus on ensuring archived data is readily accessible and integrated into normal workflows. One health system runs more than 25,000 daily FHIR transactions through an interoperability platform that integrates archived data into current workflows. This enables physicians to access both current and historical data seamlessly, allowing them to make more informed decisions at the point of care. Historic patient data maintains its utility for understanding the often-subtle beginnings of diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and other forms of dementia. Nascent AI technologies are examining historic data from patients with these diseases to better understand the origins of these maladies. By building a picture of early warning signs for debilitating diseases, clinicians can begin treatments earlier, prolonging lives or the quality of life for currently incurable conditions. But that research relies on examining longitudinal patient data contained in current systems and within an EHR archive.
Physicians want to make every second count at the point of care, although authorization burdens and increasing workloads often cut into that valuable time. EHRs are great for accessing current patient information, but system upgrades or migrations only bring over a bare minimum of data, leaving years of patient information in legacy systems or in an archive. The process of EHR data archiving involves validating and normalizing data before placing it in an active archive, where physicians can easily search for current and historical data. While AI can enhance some processes, we focus on ensuring archived data is readily accessible and integrated into normal workflows. One health system runs more than 25,000 daily FHIR transactions through an interoperability platform that integrates archived data into current workflows. This enables physicians to access both current and historical data seamlessly, allowing them to make more informed decisions at the point of care. Historic patient data maintains its utility for understanding the often-subtle beginnings of diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, and other forms of dementia. Nascent AI technologies are examining historic data from patients with these diseases to better understand the origins of these maladies. By building a picture of early warning signs for debilitating diseases, clinicians can begin treatments earlier, prolonging lives or the quality of life for currently incurable conditions. But that research relies on examining longitudinal patient data contained in current systems and within an EHR archive.

How Health Data Archiving Enables Data Usefulness

Many hospital executives still imagine an archive at the center of various legacy systems, with arrows pointing from legacy systems to a central repository where information is stored as systems are retired. There are no arrows leading from the repository. In this view, an archive is static, the place where archived data goes to die.

With the rise of generative AI, however, executives are realizing that historic data retains its value for much more than compliance and release-of-information use. While arrows should lead from legacy applications to the data repository, arrows should also emanate from the repository, fueling secondary uses that include billing and collections, patient care, claims management, and medical research.

But not all healthcare data archiving solutions are created equal. For data to be useful for secondary purposes and tactical use cases, it must be discrete, accurate, and reliable — traits that not all archive vendors can meet.

More Thought-Leadership

Leading Seamless Migrations During EHR Replacements

Leading Seamless Migrations During EHR Replacements

Written By: Jason Stewart, Conversion Services ManagerReplacing an EHR application is more than just another upgrade—it's a critical shift that can reshape your organization. However, this process carries significant risks. Studies show that up to 70% of large...

Contact Us Today